May 27, 2025
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming various sectors, from healthcare to finance, but this technological advancement brings with it a host of complex legal challenges. This article examines some of the most pressing legal issues surrounding AI today.
One of the primary legal concerns with AI is intellectual property rights related to AI-generated content. Determining ownership of creative works produced by AI systems raises questions of authorship and inventorship.
Copyright: In the United States, copyright protection generally extends to works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression. 17 U.S.C. § 102(a). Current U.S. Copyright Office guidance indicates that works lacking human authorship are not eligible for copyright protection. Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, 313.2 (3d ed. 2021). The January 2025 US Copyright Office Report on AI, Part 2, confirms "existing legal doctrines are adequate and appropriate to resolve questions of copyrightability."
Patents: Similarly, patent law requires an "inventor." 35 U.S.C. § 101. The question of whether an invention developed with the assistance of artificial intelligence is eligible for patent protection remains largely unsettled.
AI systems heavily rely on data, raising concerns about data privacy.
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): In the European Union, the GDPR imposes stringent rules on the processing of personal data. GDPR Art. 5. AI systems that collect and process personal data must comply with GDPR principles, including lawfulness, fairness, and transparency.
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): In the United States, the CCPA gives California residents certain rights over their personal data. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.100 et seq. AI systems handling personal data of California residents must adhere to CCPA requirements.
Other US State laws: Other states, such as Virginia, Colorado, Utah, and Connecticut, have also enacted their own comprehensive privacy laws, each with distinct provisions regarding AI.
AI systems can perpetuate and amplify biases present in the data they are trained on, leading to discriminatory outcomes.
Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. If an AI system used for hiring makes discriminatory decisions, it could violate this act.
Fair Housing Act: The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. AI systems used in housing decisions must not perpetuate such discrimination.
This is not an exhaustive list, but rather an overview of some of the current legal issues surrounding AI. The law is constantly evolving to keep pace with technological advancements, and these issues will continue to be debated and shaped in the coming years.
Determining authorship and ownership
17 U.S.C. § 102(a), Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, 313.2 (3d ed. 2021)
Liability for defects or harm caused by AI
Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability § 2 (1998)
Compliance with data protection regulations
GDPR Art. 5, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1798.100 et seq.
Bias and discrimination in AI
Avoiding discriminatory outcomes
42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please contact Roper Legal to discuss your specific artificial intelligence needs and obligations.
June 3, 2025
Data privacy has become a critical issue for businesses across the United States. With the increasing collection and processing of personal information, companies face mounting pressure to comply with a complex web of regulations and maintain consumer trust. One of the biggest challenges for US businesses is the lack of a comprehensive federal privacy law. Instead, we have a patchwork of state laws, each with its own requirements and nuances. This creates a complex compliance landscape for companies operating in multiple states.
For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), grants California residents significant rights over their personal information, including the right to know, the right to delete, and the right to opt-out of the sale or sharing of their data. (California Civil Code §§ 1798.100-1798.199.100). Other states, such as Virginia, Colorado, Utah, and Connecticut, have also enacted their own comprehensive privacy laws, each with distinct provisions. (Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, Va. Code Ann. §§ 59.1-571 et seq.; Colorado Privacy Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 6-1-1301 et seq.; Utah Consumer Privacy Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-61-101 et seq.; Connecticut Data Privacy Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 42-515 et seq.) Each passing year more states adopt their own privacy laws.
Even in the absence of a comprehensive federal privacy law, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has been actively enforcing against companies that engage in unfair or deceptive practices related to data privacy. The FTC Act grants the agency broad authority to protect consumers from such practices. (15 U.S.C. § 45).
The FTC has brought numerous enforcement actions against companies for failing to protect consumer data, making misleading privacy promises, or violating specific privacy laws, such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) (15 U.S.C. §§ 6501-6506). These actions highlight the FTC's focus on holding businesses accountable for their data privacy practices.
With the growth of global commerce, many US businesses engage in international data transfers. However, transferring personal data to other countries can raise complex legal and compliance issues. Businesses must ensure that such transfers comply with applicable laws and regulations, such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
The GDPR imposes strict requirements on the transfer of personal data from the EU to other countries, including the United States. (Regulation (EU) 2016/679). Businesses must have a legal basis for such transfers and may need to implement safeguards to protect the data. Recent developments in international data transfer agreements have further added to the complexity.
The rapid advancement of technology, such as artificial intelligence (AI), facial recognition, and the Internet of Things (IoT), presents new data privacy challenges. These technologies often involve the collection and processing of vast amounts of personal data, raising concerns about surveillance, discrimination, and misuse of information.
Businesses deploying these technologies must carefully consider the potential privacy implications and implement appropriate safeguards. Existing laws may need to be interpreted or updated to address the unique privacy challenges posed by emerging technologies.
Navigating the complexities of data privacy is essential for US businesses. To stay compliant and maintain consumer trust, businesses should:
Stay informed about evolving state and federal privacy laws.
Develop and implement robust data privacy policies and procedures.
Conduct regular risk assessments and audits of their data practices.
Provide transparency to consumers about how their data is collected and used.
Train employees on data privacy best practices.
By prioritizing data privacy, businesses can protect themselves from legal risks and build stronger relationships with their customers.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please contact Roper Legal to discuss your specific data privacy needs and obligations.